Commentary on Yeats: Older Critical Responses F. R. Leavis, The Problem and the Challenge, in Revaluation: Tradition and Development in English Poetry (1936; Pelican Books 1972): How much of the fully achieved thing is there in Yeatss oeuvre - what proportion of the wholly created poem that stands there unequivocally in its own right, self-sufficient? (p.60.) In their hypnoidal vaguenesses ("dim", "dream-pale") and incantatory rhythms, they exemplify that preoccupation with creating a dream-world, or poetic other-world, which Eliot in a famous essay noted as a characteristic of Victorian poetry. (p.61.) It is characteristic of Yeats to have no centre of unity, and to have been unable to find one. The lack is apparent in his solemn propoundings about the Mask and the Anti-Self, and in the related schematic elaborations. (p.75.) Note: Leavis detects an Irish habit of cultivating attitudes and postures (p.75) and finds too much of Parnassian art about "Leda and the Swan" (p.79.) [ top ] Louis MacNeice: This attachment - essentially a romantic attachment, of the Ireland that Yeats envisaged is not co-extensive with the real Ireland of small farms and small towns but a doorway on the world of Faery - turned him into a polemicist. One of the characteristics of the Nineties movement that he noted in his early Autobiographies was the indifference of the pre-Raphaelites and their followers to generalisations - yet generalisations was Yeats strongest suit. He was a born argufier, equally about nationality, and ethics, and aesthetics. He resolved this contradiction thus (Poetry of W. B. Yeats, 1941, p.27.) [ top ] Denis Donoghue, The Integrity of Yeats (Cork: Mercier Press 1964): [...] Yeats was his own battlefield, victim of his own consciousness and imagination. He could symbolise in great-rooted chestnut trees a condition in which Body is not bruised to give pleasure to Soul; but that condition was not his own, in the day-to-day struggle of his life. In the simplest version of his predicament we find him now drawn towards the pblic world of politics and theatre-management, now again retreating to the severe extremes of privacy, and more often still torn between the two exigencies. On Yeatss preoccupation with the occult: perhaps it is the furnishing of his mind with possessions consistent with his moments of resolute privacy [...; 13] In fact, strictly speaking magic in Yeats later work served only the same purpose as the faery-islands in the early poems - to fence off an area of private ground within which his Spirit might roam at will. ("Yeats and Modern Poetry: An Introduction", op .cit., pp.12-13.)
|