Some newspaper clippings affixed in copy of Musgrave's Memoir of Different Irish Rebellions (1801)

Source: Newspaper cuttings affixed in front pages of Memoirs of the different rebellions in Ireland from the arrival of the English: with a particular detail of that which broke out the XXIIIrd of May, MDCCXCVII [1797]: [1st edn.] (Dublin: Milliken 1801; London: Stockdale 1801) – copy held in New York Public Library – available at Internet Archive [as infra]. The cuttings are attached by glue in place on a free page before the printed matter (1) and on the title-page verso (2 & 3). A text copy of the Memoirs can be found in RICORSO Library > Criticism > History > Legacy - via index or as attached.
https://archive.org/details/memoirsofdiffere00musg/page/n13/mode/2up

1: Account of a duel between Sir Richard Musgrave and Mr William Todd Jones (Times, [1] May 1802)

A duel was fought at nine o’clock in the morning, on Rathfarnham Strand, Dublin, between Sir Richard Musgrave and Mr. William Todd Jones. Mr. May was second to Sir Richard, and Mr. T. O’Mara was second to Mr. Jones. Having taken their ground. Sir R. was wounded on the first fire, his antagonist’s ball striking him on the side of the abdomen, and falling out near the left thigh; he was carried to his house, and we are happy to hear is in a fair way of recovery. — The cause of this unfortunate affair was, Sir R. having made some animadversions on the character of Mr, Jones, in his History of the “Irish Rebellion.”
 In a sort of Supplement to that Work, intitled Observations on the Reply of Dr. Caulfield, Roman Catholic Bishop, and of the Roman Catholic Clergy of Wexford, to the Misrepresentations of Sir Richard Musgrave, Bart, and on other Writers who have animadverted on the “Memoirs of the Irish Rebellions,” Sir Richard has the following passage:—
 “Mr. Wm. Todd Jones is very much incensed with me for having quoted part of a letter written by him in the year 1792, to that illustrious Body the United Irishmen of which it is said he was a member) in favour of the Roman Catholics. From some part of Wales, where he resides, he published a furious tirade of abuse against me, which has been circulated with malignant credulity by his good friends, the United Irishmen, In framing it, he seems to have extracted from the Billingsgate Vocabulary a number of opprobrious epithets and appellations, which those who know me, must be convinced are no more attached to my character than the scurrilous railings of a drunken fish-woman to an unknown passenger. I will not degrade myself by attempting to answer so contemptible a production. I shall only observe, that any thing coming from the pen of Mr. Jones can no more wound my feelings than it can injure my character; and, though I am not an adept at scolding,  I dread his pen as little as I do his sword.
On Sunday, May 25, Counsellors O’Brien and O’Dwyer, waited upon Sir Richard Musgrave, and delivered to him the following written message:

“Sir Richard, Mr. Todd Jones considers your mention of his sword in your late publication, joined to your other expressions, as a direct call upon him, and he desires you will please to appoint time and place for a meeting.”

Sir Richard Musgrave then almost immediately signed the following paper, as previously drawn up:

“I am sorry for having imputed any unworthy motives to Win. Todd Jones, Esq. and I retract every expression tending to wound his feelings.”

“Richard Musgrave.”


Signed in presence of Us,
May 23, 1802,
Morgan John O’Dwyer
Dennis O’Brien, jun.

The above transaction is to be published by Sir Richard Musgrave’s consent, in the British and Irish Newspapers, and in the Moniteur of Paris; and a copy of Sir Richard’s retraction is to be printed by himself, in nine days from the date hereof, in the new edition of his work now going to press.

Promised in presence of us, “Morgan J. O’Dwyer. “Dennis O’Brien.”

The Account adds, that Sir Richard Musgrave, conceiving his character had suffered by his retraction, wished to withdraw it. The duel was the consequence.

[End.]

[ top ]

2: Account of the Death by Suicide of Sir Thomas Fitzgerald, bart. (Times, 2 May 1864)
(FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENT.)

Dublin, April 31st. Sir Thomas Judkin Fitzgerald, the descendant a man unhappily notorious in 1798, committed suicide on  Tuesday night last by throwing himself into the River Suir near his own residence, Golden Hills. It appears that he was severely pressed by pecuniary difficulties. He had been in Dublin the greater part of the previous week, it is supposed with the object of effecting an arrangement with some of his creditors. There he was met by several of his friends, who found him in his usual health and spirits. He returned home, and was in Clonmel on Monday. It appears that there was an execution then in his house for a debt of £300, and the bailiffs were in possession. He made a last effort to raise this amount on Monday morning, but his solicitor failed to accomplish it, owing to the heavy liabilities under which he laboured. He went home by the train on Tuesday afternoon, having left a letter with his solicitor stating that he should shortly be no more, and indicating where his body would be found. This gentleman immediately communicated with the office of the constabulary, and a telegram was at once sent with imperative orders for the instant arrest of Sir Thomas Fitzgerald. But the precaution was, unfortunately, too late. He wrote similar letters to other friends, and among them was the following to Mr, John Massy, justice of the peace: —
Dublin, April 26, 1864.

My dear Massy, —

I have a last request to make of you, and that is that you will on receipt of this go over to Golden Hills and see poor Lady Fitzgerald, my dearly beloved wife, for before you get this I will be no more. God have mercy upon me and my poor family ………
I ask this as a dying request, that you will go at once on receipt of this and see what is best to be done. ……...
I go down to-night on purpose to see my poor wife and family for the last time, and then my body will be found in the weir at that part culled the Pig-hole, near Golden Hills. ….
I again ask you, as a favour, not to desert my family till things are set to rights for them. It is the dying request of vour friend,

THOMAS J. FITZGERALD.


There was also a letter to Mr. Edmond Dalton, of which the following is a copy: —

Dublin, April 26, 1864.

Dear Ned, — I am going to ask a favour of you, and that is that you will get Mrs. Dalton to break the sad news of my death to poor Lady Fitzgerald. I go down this evening, and my poor body will be found in the Suir at Pig-hole, where all the salmon are taken, near where the white thorn stump is that was lately cut. Tho Lord have mercy on me and my poor family!

Yours truly,         
THOMAS J. FITZGERALD.”

From the evidence given by his coachman and butler at the inquest, held yesterday by Dr. Morrissy, coroner of the district, we learn what occurred in pursuance of those letters. Sir Thomas arrived from Dublin at the Goold-Cross [sic] station at 11.30 p.m. on Tuesday night. He drove the car himself very carefully. He was unusually silent, and seemed rather angry, as if he was disappointed about some-thing; but otherwise in his ordinary state of mind. He reached Golden Hills about half-past 12 o’clock. The family had retired to rest, except the butler, who waited up for his master. He first went up-stairs, it was supposed to Lady Fitzgerald’s room. In about 10 minutes he returned and took some tea. Some time after he went to the parlour door and said, “Michael, come and take away the things.” When the butler was doing as he was directed his master went into his study. He again went up-stairs, but shortly after the same servant heard him unbar the hall door and go out. He had taken no wine or spirits, and used never to take any. The servant, taking no notice of his going out, as he sometimes had occasion to do so, went to bed. After about an hour Lady Fitzgerald tapped at his door and said, “Michael, get up. Sir Thomas is gone out somewhere and he has not returned. You had better go out towards the shrubbery and see what is the matter, I fear he has .got a weakness.” The butler then went to tho shrubbery, and not finding his master, Lady Fitzgerald became alarmed, and a second search, with a lantern, was made about the grounds in vain. At daylight the coachman was called, and when the search was about to be renewed, Lady Fitzgerald came to Bourke, the butler, and said — “Michael, come here. I must have been stupid that I did not find this letter before now.” She had a letter in her hand, which she said she had found on a stand at the side of the bed where her husband used to lie. She read a part of it. He inferred from it that all was over with Sir Thomas. He and Rourke, the coach-man, then hurried out and searched all the grounds. At length they found his hat and coat on the bank of the river near the spot which the deceased had himself indicated. They hastened with this information to Lady Fitzgerald, the police were sent for, and about 200 yards further down the body was found in the shallow water. Life was extinct. The Hon. Martin French, R.M., of Cashel, arrived early in the day, with Dr. Kennedy, of Tipperary, who examined the body, and found it without any marks of external violence. As Sir Thomas was a remarkably good swimmer it is supposed he must have taken some drug to prevent the failure of his attempt at self-destruction. The inquiry had not concluded when the last account left.

(End.)

 
3: Account of the misfortunes of the descendants of “Flogger” Fitzgerald (Times, 7 May 1864.)
(From our own Correspondent).

Dublin, May 6: The affliction of Lady Fitzgerald and her family has been aggravated by a barbarous outrage on the part of the peasantry. The popular feeling, it seems, did not go with the verdict of the jury, and the impression that prevailed among the lower classes was that the suicide of Sir Thomas Fitzgerald was deliberate and of malice prepense, with the avowed purpose of defrauding his creditors. Consequently, they thought that the verdict should have been simply that he was guilty of self-murder, and as such unworthy of Christian burial. This view is to be ascribed! chiefly to an hereditary animosity to the family, dating from 1798, when the grandfather of the late baronet, by his atrocious cruelties to the insurgents, acquired the sobriquet of “the Flogger,” by which he was long remembered in Tipperary. The Irish peasantry firmly believe in Providential retribution in cases of oppression, and, if the wrongdoer escapes in this life, they have no doubt that his descendants will be punished in his stead. The history of this family seems to have confirmed the popular belief, for it has suffered several heavy calamities, and all have been regarded as divine judgments. These son of “the Flogger,” who inherited his titles ~and estates, was drowned coming from Liverpool in the Nimrod. A young son of the suicide hanged himself some years ago from a nail stuck in the wall, to which he fastened a cord. According to the popular story, the boy was showing to his little sister and brother how his grandfather used to hand the rebels. Believing, however, that the verdict should have been felo-de-se, a mob of strangers assembled in the churchyard of Ballygriffin on Saturday evening, and filled the grave with stones. The funeral procession was as private as possible, the remains being followed only by a few relatives and friends. They were met by the mob at the gate, expressing in such menacing terms their determination that the corpse of the suicide should not enter that consecrated ground that all remonstrances and entreaties were unavailing ; and the coffin had to be borne back to the house. The Rev. Mr. Ryan, P.P., exerted himself to calm the excitement of the people; and next day he addressed them from, the altar, strongly condemning their conduct. On Monday morning the interment took place under the protection of a strong body of constabulary 150 in number. A guard remains upon the grave day and night. The funeral service was read by the Rev. J. M. Poole, rector of the parish. The Rev. Mr. Ryan and his curate, Mr. O’Connor, were present, and exhorted the people not to disturb the remains just committed to the ground.


[ close ] [ top ]