Emma Donoghue

[Images clockwise by Chris Roulston; publicity, and Patrick Fraser.]

[top ]

[top ]

Hear Róisín Ingle,Irish Times interview with Emma Donogue -online; accessed 18.05.2014.)

... Reads from Motherhood.

See alsoIrish TimesSound Cloud -online.

[top ]

Bibliographical details

The Woman who Gave Birth to Rabbits (London: Virago, 2002), 212pp. [ded. ‘... with love to my father, Denis, who taught me that books are for letting us imagine lives other than our own.’ Contents: Foreword [ix]; The Last Rabbit [1]; Acts of Union [15]; The Fox on the Line [29]; Account [41]; Revelations [45; on the Buchanites]; Night Vision [63]; Ballad [73]; Come, Gentle Night [82; on Ruskin’s Marriage]; Salvage [95]; Cured [106; an English case of clitorectomy]; Figures of Speech [125; on Mary Stuart O’Donnell, Countess of Tyrconnell]; Words for Things [132; on Mary Wollstonecroft with the Kingsborough family in Cork]; How a Lady Dies [146; on Elizabeth Pennington and her companion Frances Sheridan in Bath]; A Short Story [163; on an Irish female dwarf]; Dido [170; on a black gd. of Lord Mansfield]; The Necessity of Burning [184; on the Peasants’ Revolt]; Looking for Petronilla [200; on Dame Alice Kyteler of Kilkenny].

[top ]

[top ]

Commentary
Gerry Smyth,The Novel and the Nation: Studies in the New Irish Fiction (London: Pluto Press 1997), onStir-fry: ‘The tactics employed by Donoghue as she sets about normalising lesbianism include engagement with traditional narrative modes, concentration on individual psycholo&y and the avoidance of stereotypes.Stir-fry is a variation on the traditionalBildungsroman novel, a form which seems particularly suited to the ‘coming-out’ narrative so fundamental to modern homosexual discourse. Maria, as so many novelistic heroes and heroines before her, leaves the country and the family embrace to find herself in the city. Through an interwoven process of social and psychological development she reaches a sense of that self and with at least one element of her identity finally named - lesbian. It is unclear if she will manage to come out to her family, as the novel makes it clear that lesbianism is still a problem for the traditional religious and familial discourses informing Irish society. But by concentrating on Maria’s self-discovery and the melodrama of the triangular relationship rather than the wider social status of lesbianism, focus remains on the narrative rather than on the ‘issue’. In the process of rejecting Jael’s seduction, Maria realises that she wants Ruth. The text thus remains true to itsBildungsroman form and reaches a traditional point of closure - the selfconstitution of the central character through recognition of her significant other.’ (p.159). Remarks onHood: ‘Having insisted upon normality and visibility inStir-fry, Donoghue’s second novel represents a bolder and more formally ambitious exploration of modern Irish lesbian experience ... longer, more intricately structures and, in its graphic depiction of lesbian sex, less concerned to bridge the gap between the straightgeist than to engage as fully as possible with the specifics of lesbian identity’. (p.163; see also pp.163-65.)

[Shirley Kelly,] ‘Taking Readers Where they Can’t Go on Holidays’, interview with Emma Donoghue inBooks Ireland (Sept. 2000), p.209, notes:Sammerkins (Virago) is the story of Mary Saunders, a prostitute from 13, who becomes involved with a hired killer, based on a brief reference to a teenage girl who killed a woman in Monmouth in 1763 which Donoghue found in an encyclopaedia of Welsh women’s history. Donoghue remarks: ‘The fact that the historical sources were so minimal was very liberating to the imagination [...]’ Further: ‘So much of women’s history will never be unearthed now - the hard evidence never having been gathered or being long lost - that it seems to me fictional forms may offer the best hope of bringing the hidden past to life in all its fulness and contradiction.’ (p.209). See also Alev Adil, review ofSlammerkins, inTimes Literary Supplement (21 July 2000), p.24.

[Shirley Kelly,] interview, inBooks Ireland (Sept. 2004), p.171: Donoghue calls history ‘a warehouse of stories for me to burgle’; discussesLife Mask, the true story of Elizabeth Farren, Ann[e] Damer and Lord Derby, centred on the ‘outing’ of Ann Damer in the 1790s in a diary-entry of Mrs Piozzi. Remarks: ‘I’ll probably go back and forth between historical and contemporary fiction [...] you’ve got people like Beryl Bainbridge, Julian barnes, Margaret Atwood, Joe O’Connor, Anne Enright, all choosing to set a novel in the past, and that’s helped historical fiction to shake off the shackles of genre [...]’.

Alex Clark, ‘Rescued from History’, reviewingThe Woman who Gave Birth to Rabbits (Virago, 2002), 212pp., inTimes Literary Supplement (7 June 2002), speaks of the problems of historically-based fiction, in this case an ‘elaborate natal con trick’, and Donoghue’s avoidance of them in her ‘quiet out-takes from the margins of British history’; cites story titles “The Fox on the Line” (anti-vivisectionists in 1870s), “How a Lady Dies” (18th c. Bath), “Acts of Union” (drunken soldier tricked into marriage), “Come, Gentle Night” (doomed wedding of John Ruskin and Effie Gray); “Revelations” (fasting apocalytic evangelists); “Cured” (enforced cliterectomy and sex-slavery); characterises the collection as ‘an unshowy but deeply generous book.’ (TLS, p.22.)

Luke Clancy, review ofLadies and Gentlemen, a play by Emma Donoghue, deals with history of Annie Hindle, a nineteenth-century female impersonator of men in vaudeville; panned by Clancy who considers that the plodding threadbare storyline could be mistaken for a costume melodrama (Irish Times, 20 April 1996).

Lorna Gibb, ‘Female Friendship’, review of Emma Donoghue,Life Mask, inTimes Literary Supplement, [25 June 2004], p.21: ‘At the centre ofLife Mask is a love triangle, involving historical figures whose personalities, as the author is careful to inform us, have been recreated using the available facts. [...] Lord Derby’s fixation with, and determined pursuit of, Eliza is the thread the narrative follows against a background of scandal, promiscuity and high finance, yet it is the relationship between Anne and Eliza that is crucial to the plot. Their connection is founded in the kind of intimacy that was socially acceptable in the eighteenth century between two like-minded women. It is this association - the very thing which brings Eliza acceptance - that threatens her precarious social position. / Anne’s strength, Derby’s adoration and Eliza’s sexuality create an atmosphere of passionate sensuality; small private spaces and intimate moments for the protagonists act as a counterpart to the salacious gossip and heartlessness of the wider world. The juxtaposition of the public arenas of war and politics with the personal dramas of sexual orientation and insecurity are skilfully managed by Donoghue. The dominant theme is of creation, of stripping away layers to reveal what lies underneath; an act of creation which is suggested by the book’s title (the “life mask” is a model Anne makes of Eliza’s face) as well as by its structure. Just as a work of art, so Donoghue constructs her novel by disclosing what lies hidden beneath the familiar glamour of an age. [...] Donoghue uses a social historian’s tools to depict the world ofbon ton , making use of small concrete details, such as the inconvenience of long, bumpy carriage rides and the lisping affectations adopted by Georgiaria’s intimate circle. But it is thanks to Donogbue’s skill as a novelist that her characters are so vividly and amusingly resurrected. The dialogue gives the reader a strong flavour of the tittle-tattle and repartee of the period, and the careful descriptions of place and costume create a bright pictorial backdrop. / The only real flaw in the reconstruction of period detail is that, at times, the presentation of historical detail seems a little contrived, information included because the author managed to find it out. [...].’

Sarah Bakewell, ‘A feeling for feeling’, review ofTouchy Subjects, inTimes Literary Supplement (24 Nov. 2006), p.20: ‘These stories’ subjects are touchy in two ways. They deal with matters of “taboo and embarrassment”, as the author’s website puts it. Emma Donoghue’s characters leave sperm stains on hotel carpets, or become obsessed with a girlfriend’s chin hair but dare not mention it, or fret about what to do when they find a man lying unconscious in the street. / But these are also touchy tales in that many of them concern touch, or, sometimes, the absence of it. The title story is a hilarious farce involving conception without sexual contact. A man agrees to impregnate his wife’s best friend in a hotel room; he takes with him an empty baby-food jar for the purpose, but finds the procedure less straightforward than he expected. The attempt turns into a fiasco on several levels, until his wife saves the day with a bout of telephone sex. [...] a collection whose main virtue is not depth or resonance so much as surface versatility. Donoghue speaks in many voices. She sets her stories in different locations, from Florence to Louisiana, and shows expertise in many genres - mood pieces, comedies, moral fables, romantic erotica. One has the impression of a professional who can make literary capital from any experience, from a trip to Los Angeles to a cat’s illness, to the teaching of a writing class. In isolation, each story would shine on its own merits; in a collection, all this virtuosity can be fatiguing. / Still, there are great pleasures inTouchy Subjects, including the humour in the title story [...]’ (For full-text copy, see RICORSOLibrary, “Criticism > Reviews”, viaindex, ordirect.)

Declan Hughes, ‘This book will break your heart’, review ofRoom by Emma Donoghue, inThe Irish Times (7 Aug. 2010), Weekend, p.8: ‘[...]Room, Emma Donoghue’s extraordinary new novel, draws on the harrowing cases of Sabine Dardenne, Natascha Kampusch and Elisabeth Fritzl, and many of the details are true to one or another of their testimonies, as Donoghue freely acknowledges, but this is no semi-fictionalised wallow in the misery mire. Charming, funny, artfully constructed and at times almost unbearably moving, Donoghue mines material that on the face of it appears intractably bleak and surfaces with a powerful, compulsively readable work of fiction that defies easy categorization. [...] A typical, if exceptionally bright, boy, Jack loves Dora The Explorer and his Ma. If he was made of cake he’d eat himself before somebody else could. He can read very well and green beans are his food enemy. Less typically, Jack has spent his entire life in an eleven by eleven foot room with no natural light apart from God’s yellow face through Skylight, and he still feeds at his mother’s breast. Not only has he never been outside, he thinks Room is an entire world in itself, and that people on TV are made of colours and don’t really exist. [...] Part childhood adventure story, part adult thriller,Room is above all the most vivid, radiant and beautiful expression of maternal love I have ever read. Emma Donoghue has stared into the abyss, honoured her sources and returned with the literary equivalent of a great Madonna and Child. This book will break your heart.’ (For full-text copy, see RICORSOLibrary, “Criticism > Reviews”, viaindex, ordirect.)

[top ]

Sara Crown, ‘Emma Donoghue: “To say Room is based on the Josef Fritzl case is too strong“’, review ofRoom, inThe Guardian(13 Aug. 2010): ‘[...] Until now, Donoghue's reputation had been founded on her knack for spotting historical rough diamonds and buffing them into glowing narratives.Slammerkin, her unlikely bestseller in 2000, was spun out of a murder on the Welsh borders in 1763, while in 2006 The Sealed Letter took a notorious Victorian divorce as its grist. In the run-up to publication, however, word was that Donoghue's seventh novel would be based on the modern-day case of Josef Fritzl, who locked his daughter, Elisabeth, in a basement for 24 years, raped her repeatedly and fathered her seven children – three of whom he imprisoned with her. Unsurprisingly, accusations of cynicism and sensationalism abounded. When I meet Donoghue, halfway through a publication tour that has mushroomed thanks to her longlisting, she recalls the period as “quite painful. A lot of people made out I was writing this sinister, money-making book to exploit the grief of victims. I was thinking, it’s not like that, but no one will know until they read it.”’ [Cont.]

Sara Crown, review ofRoom, inThe Guardian(13 Aug. 2010) - cont.: ‘She is keen, too, to contextualise the link between her novel and the Fritzl case. “To sayRoom is based on the Fritzl case is too strong,” she says firmly. “I’d say it was triggered by it. The newspaper reports of Felix Fritzl [Elisabeth’s son], aged five, emerging into a world he didn’t know about, put the idea into my head. That notion of the wide-eyed child emerging into the world like a Martian coming to Earth: it seized me.” / The whump Donoghue experienced on hearing Felix Fritzl’s story may have had something to do with the fact that her own son was four at the time. ‘[...] Donoghue says [of the central character Jack]: “I didn’t give him a childhood because I didn’t want to let him off the hook. Once he’s arrested he disappears, because I refuse to be that interested in him. As a society we’ve given disproportionate attention to the psychopaths – the average thriller is about a psychopath who wants to rape and chop up a woman. I wanted to focus on how a woman could create normal love in a box.”’ [Cont.]

Sara Crown, review ofRoom, inThe Guardian(13 Aug. 2010) - cont.: ‘Donoghue’s success in doing just that positions her book as a response of sorts to another novel based on a real-life crime. In Lionel Shriver’s Orange-prizewinningWe Need to Talk About Kevin, sparked by the Columbine massacre, a mother and her son create hell in the heart of a middle-class idyll; inRoom, Ma and Jack conjure humdrum beauty out of a kind of hell. “I found Shriver’s book very inspiring,” Donoghue says. “Every parent has those moments where they look at their child and think, ‘There’s a demon in those eyes and no one can see it but me!’ I could see how she extrapolated from that. WithRoom, I was trying to extrapolate from those moments where, as a parent, you think, ‘I’ve been stuck in this room playing with this doll for years!’ Shriver is also a great reminder that you don’t have to be a parent to write these stories [Shriver is childless]. I hate it when people say, ‘Oh, you could only have written this as a mother.’ The best book I know about being a battered wife is Roddy Doyle’sThe Woman Who Walked Into Doors. Writers should be applauded for their ability to make things up.” (For full text version, see RICORSOLibrary, “Criticism > Reviews”, viaindex, ordirect. See also related extract fromRoom,infra.)

Aimee Bender, ‘Separation Anxiety’, review ofRoom by Emma Donoghue, inThe New York Times(16 Sept. 2010), Sunday Book Review: ‘Emma Donoghue’s remarkable new novel,Room, is built on two intense constraints: the limited point of view of the narrator, a 5-year-old boy named Jack; and the confines of Jack’s physical world, an 11-by-11-foot room where he lives with his mother. We enter the book strongly planted within these restrictions. We know only what Jack knows, and the drama is immediate, as is our sense of disorientation over why these characters are in this place. Jack seems happily ensconced in a routine that is deeply secure, in a setting where he can see his mother all day, at any moment. She has created a structured, lively regimen for him, including exercise, singing and reading. The main objects in the room are given capital letters - Rug, Bed, Wall - a wonderful choice, because to Jack, they are named beings. In a world where the only other companion is his mother, Bed is his friend as much as anything else. Jack, in this way, is a heightened version of a regular kid, bringing boundless wonder and meaning to his every pursuit. / Donoghue navigates beautifully around these limitations. Jack’s voice is one of the pure triumphs of the novel: in him, she has invented a child narrator who is one of the most engaging in years - his voice so pervasive I could hear him chatting away during the day when I wasn’t reading the book.’ (See full-text copy in RICORSOLibrary, “Criticism > Reviews”, viaindex, ordirect.)

Una Mullally, ‘In love with life’s losers’- interview-article on Emma Donoghue, in The Irish Times [Sat.] (15 march 2014), Weekend Review - notes thatRoom is being filmed. ‘[...] Her latest novel,Frog Music, steps away again from the departure that wasRoom and back to historical fiction. Donoghue does suffocation well. The atmosphere in Frog Music is stifling. It’s the summer of 1876 in San Francisco, and in the saloons and burlesque parlours in the midst of a heatwave, a crime unfolds. A young woman, Jenny Bonnet, is shot, her French friend Blanche Beunon is on the tail of her murderer. Or is the murderer on hers? / “Donkeys years ago” Donoghue came across a one-paragraph description of the case in a book about wild women of the Victorian age. Since then, she was drawn intoThe Wire. “It struck me that I wanted to write a historical novel which would be like that. It would take the scum of the earth seriously, these drifters, not just Jenny, but all the people she knew, these French lowlifes. Even though they’re sordid in many ways, to take their struggles seriously and give them that moment of dignity.” / Donoghue’s mum liked bringing her to Famine graveyards, poking around the headstones and seeing what they said. Or to stately homes and wandering around their kitchens. “For political reasons, I started getting interested in the nobodies,” she says of her approach to history. “First of all, women. So my first historical novelSlammerkin was very much like “Okay, I’m going to take this total nobody and I’m going to find out what made her tick.”’ (Availableonline; accessed 16.03.2014.)

Incls. quotations - viz.:   “I’m not that intensive about the writing process. I don’t go off to a hut in the woods to write my books. I very much, in the spirit of Jane Austen, I write, and when my friends come in the door, I slap the laptop shut and talk to my friends. I try not to be precious about it. But you’ve got to be so preoccupied with the subject of your story that you don’t even count the days you spend researching trivia.
   “Does her sock have a tassel on it? You look up the history of tassels. It’s such a pleasure to follow those questions as far as you need to follow them. To look up every picture you can find of burlesque dancers and costumes and try to figure out when the skirt dance arrived, when the can-can arrived. You just need to go down into these wormholes. And then of course throw away most of your research, but it’s not really thrown away because you’ve chosen the very juiciest little morsels from it, and it all enhances what you’re writing.” (There is a photo-port. by Eric Luke.)

Quotations
‘Noises from Woodsheds’, in Ide O’Carroll and Eibhear Walsh, ed.,Lesbian and Gay Visions of Ireland, ?1995): [speaking of growing up at a time when] ‘Irish lesbian still had the ring of a contradiction in terms: how was I to conceive of myself as a practising Catholic and a furious lesbian feminist, a sweet colleen and a salty sinner?’ (p.159).

Hood (1995): ‘I run and run till my lungs are burning up, and finally corner her. She turns, her gauzy hood falling back. Was I expecting decay behind a mask of powder, or the grin of bone? She has my own face. It is my own face that looks back at me, almost understandingly. Then she turns and runs on, after Cara. I can hear their laughter in the distance.’ (p.302; quoted in Gerry Smyth,The Novel and the Nation: Studies in the New Irish Fiction, London: Pluto Press 1997, pp.164, 165.) [For longer quotations, seeattached.]

‘The little voices in our heads that last a lifetime’, inThe Irish Times (7. Aug. 2010), Weekend, p.8.: ‘[...] If you’re anything like me, your mind houses a ragged gang of them: valiant Scout fromTo Kill a Mockingbird, maybe; Twain’s crafty Tom Sawyer; Roddy Doyle’s awkwardPaddy Clarke; the rational yet temperamentalAlice in Wonderland. The child narrators of great novels never grow up, never grow old, and certainly never die. They keep their grubby-fingered hold on us long after we’ve forgotten everything else about the books that spawned them. The young protagonist of L. P. Hartley’sThe Go-between, for instance; I couldn’t tell you much about the plot, but I’ll never forget the boy’s lingering confusion, in the overheated fragrance of summer, or his embarrassment about mishearing the name “Hugh” as “who”. / I’m using “narrator” in a broad sense, here, to mean a point-of-view character. Like most readers, I often can’t recall whether a book is written in the present tense or the past, the third person or the first or even the second; those are technical points for the author to worry about. All the reader demands is a moving and gripping perspective on the events of the story, and a sense of authenticity and immediacy. (Think of the sensory freshness of childhood in the opening pages ofPortrait of the Artist as a Young Man.) / For my new novelRoom, I never felt I had a choice. It’s about a five-year-old boy who has never known (or even known about) a world outside the 11 x 11 foot cell somewhere in America in which he lives happily enough with his beloved young Ma: the novel had to be entirely from Jack’s perspective. A woman’s story of kidnap, confinement, rape and motherhood would be too obvious a tear-jerker. What drew me to this material was the notion that, for the child, this could be an entirely different kind of story, more like a cross between science fiction, an adventure and a fairytale. SoRoom’s point of view was its whole point.’ (For full text version, seeattached.)

[top ]

References
Katie Donovan,A. N. Jeffares &Brendan Kennelly, eds.,Ireland’s Women (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan 1994), contains extract fromStir-Fry (1994; reissued 1995).

Webpages: There is an official Emma Donoghue website [link], with extracts (e.g., (“Expecting” [link]). See alsoJanuary Magazine, Interview [link]; the Canadian Writers’ Union Page [link]; Virago Press Profile [link], and Norton 20th Century Anthology [link].

[top ]

Notes
Life Mask (2004): There is a of Eliza Farren by Anne Damer in the National Portrait Gallery (London). The characters in he love-triangle are Lord Derby [Edward Smith Stanley], possessor of the oldest earldom in England, the artist Anne Damer, of the actress Eliza Farren, renowned from roles in Sheridan and Derby’s mistress, and Eliza Farren, a sculptress and her intimate friend.

Dublin Gay Theatre Festival - Executive: Brian Merriman (Artistic Director/Managing Director), John H Pickering (Administrative Director/Company Secretary), Eddie Devoy, Victor Merriman (Waterford DIT), Roshene Pickering, Barbara Cashen, Gearoid Ó Byrne; Patrons: David Norris andEmma Donoghue; directors Ann Maire Dolan, Mark Banchansky and Richard Wentges. Friends: John Walsh, Mark Coogan, Caitriona Farrelly, Bruce Carolan, John O’Driscoll, Andrew Kearns, Paul Byrne, Nial O’Dwyer, Majella Costigan and Dearbhaile O’Neill; supporters: Maurice Knightly, Kevin Smith, Diana Humphrey and Tiffany Jones, Caroline Quinn and Kathy Sherry. (Goonline.)

[top ]