James Joyce Criticism - Tables of Contents (1): 1920-1979

Tables of Contents - Monographs and Collections

[Samuel Beckett, et. al. [& ed.], Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress (Paris: Shakespeare & Co. 1929) -

CONTENTS: Samuel Beckett, ‘Dante... Bruno, Vico.. Joyce’ [1-22]; Marcel Brion, ‘The Idea of Time in the Work of James Joyce’ [23-34]; Frank Budgen, ‘James Joyce’s Work in Progress and Old Norse Poetry’ [35-46]; Stuart Gilbert, ‘Prolegomena to Work in Progress’ [47-76]; Eugene Jolas, ‘The Revolution of Language and James Joyce’ [77-92]; Victor Llona, ‘I Dont Know What to Call It but Its Mighty Unlike Prose’ [93-102]; Robert McAlmon, ‘Mr. Joyce Directs an Irish Word Ballet’ [103-16]; Thomas McGreevy, ‘The Catholic Element in Work in Progress’ [117-27]; Elliot Paul, ‘Mr. Joyce’s Treatment of Plot’ [129-38]; John Rodker, ‘Joyce and his Dynamic’ [139-46]; Robert Sage, ‘Before Ulysses, and After’ [147-70]; W. C. Williams, ‘A Point for American Criticism’ [171-85]; Two Letters of Protest: G. V. L. Slingsby, ‘Writes a Common Reader’ [189-92]; Vladimir Dixon, ‘A Litter to Mr. James Joyce’. [193-94].

Note: The 1962 New Directions Edition is prefaced with Introduction by Sylvia Beach [vii-viii] in which the Dixon piece is erroneously attrib. to Joyce, as being now known to have been a real person.]

Seon Givens, ed., James Joyce: Two Decades of Criticism (NY: Vanguard 1948; rep. 1963). CONTENTS: Eugene Jolas, ‘My Friend James Joyce’; Frank Budgen, ‘James Joyce’; Irene Hendry, ‘Joyce’s Epiphanies’; R. Levin-C. Shattuck, ‘First Flight to Ithaca’; James T. Farrell, ‘Exiles and Ibsen’; Hugh Kenner, ‘The Portrait in Perspective’; James T. Farrell, ‘Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist’; T. S. Eliot, ‘Ulysses, Order, and Myth’ [p.201]; S. Foster Damon, ‘The Odyssey in Dublin’; Philip Toynbee, ‘A Study of James Joyce’s Ulysses’; Vivian Mercier, ‘Dublin under the Joyces’; William Troy, ‘Notes on Finnegans Wake’; Edmund Wilson, ‘The Dream of H. C. Earwicker’; Frank Budgen, ‘Joyce’s Chapters of Going Forth by Day’; Joseph Campbell, ‘Finnegan the Wake’; Frederick J. Hoffman, ‘Infroyce’; J. F. Hendry, ‘James Joyce’; Stuart Gilbert, ‘James Joyce’; T. S. Eliot, ‘A Message to the Fish’.

Jack P. Dalton & Clive Hart, eds., Twelve and a Tilly: Essays on the Occasion of the 25th Anniversary of Finnegans Wake (London: Faber & Faber 1966), 142pp. CONTENTS: Padraic Colum, ‘In Memory of James Joyce’ [9]; Frank Budgen, ‘Resurrection’ [11]; Frederick J. Hoffman, ‘“The Seim Anew”: Flux and Family in Finnegans Wake’ [16]; Vivian Mercier, ‘James Joyce and the Macaronic Tradition’ [26]; Fritz Senn, ‘Insects Appalling’ [36]; Robert F. Gleckner, ‘Byron on Finnegans Wake’ [40]; James Atherton, ‘Sport and Games in Finnegans Wake’ [65]; J. Mitchell Morse, ‘On Teaching Finnegans Wake’ [72]; Nathan Halper, ‘The Date of Earwicker’s Dream’ [72]; Richard Kain, ‘“Nothing Odd Will Do Long”: Some Thoughts on Finnegans Wake Twenty-five Years Later’ [91]; A. Walton Litz, ‘Use of the Finnegans Wake Manuscripts’ [99]; David Hayman, ‘“Scribbledehobbles and How They Grew: A Turning Point in the Development of a Chapter’ [107]; Jack P. Dalton, ‘Advertisement for the Restoration’ [119]; References [138]; Contributors [139]; Editorial Afterword [141].

Maria Jolas, ed., James Joyce Yearbook (Paris: transition press 1949), 195pp. CONTENTS: Stuart Gilbert, ‘Sketch of a scenario of Anna Livia Plurabelle’; Wladimir Weidlé, ‘On the present state of poetic language’; Louis Gillet, ‘Stele for James Joyce’; Roland von Weber, ‘On and about Joyce’s Exiles’; Hermann Broch, ‘Joyce and the present age’; Heinrich Straumann, ‘Last meeting with Joyce’; Paul Léon, ‘In memory of Joyce’; Philippe Soupault, ‘Recollections of James Joyce’; Clémence Ramnoux. ‘The Finn cycle’; Ad-writer, ‘Interview with Mr. John Stanislas Joyce’ [prob. a hoax by Brian O’Nolan].

Thomas Staley, ed. James Joyce Today: Essays on the Major Works (Indiana UP 1966; rep. 1970), viii, 183pp. CONTENTS: R. G. Kelly, ‘Joyce Hero’; Herbert Howarth, ‘Chamber Music and Its Place in the Joyce Canon’; James S. Atherton, ‘The Joyce of Dubliners’; William T. Noon, ‘A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: After Fifty Years’; Richard M. Kain, ‘The Position of Ulysses Today; W. Blissett, ‘James Joyce in the Smithy of his Soul’; Clive Hart, ‘Finnegans Wake in Perspective.’

Maurice Harmon, ed., The Celtic Master: Essays by Donagh MacDonagh, Niall Montgomery, Norman Silverstein, Margaret C. Solomon, Stanley Sultan [First James Joyce Symposium in Dublin, 1967] (Dublin: Dolmen Press 1969), 57pp. CONTENTS: Maurice Harmon, Introduction [7]; Niall Montgomery, ‘A Context for Mr. Joyce’s Work’ [9]; ‘The Lass of Aughrim or the Betrayal of James Joyce’; Norman Silverstein, ‘Evolution of the Nighttown Setting’ [27]; Margaret C. Solomon, ‘The Phallic Tree of Finnegans Wake [37]; Stanley Sultan, ‘A Joycean Look at the Playboy of the Western World’ [45]. Notes on contributors.

Ulick O’Connor, ed. & intro., The Joyce We Knew (Cork: Mercier Press 1967; rep. Brandon Press 2004), 126pp., ill. CONTENTS: Introduction, pp.7-18; contribs. Eugene Sheehy, pp.19-38 [see extract]; William G. Fallon, pp.39-56 [see extract]; Padraic Colum, pp.57-83 [see extract]; Arthur Power, pp.85-111; Sean Lester, 113-26 [End]. Inside front and end-paper holds cubist picture of Joyce by Arthur Power (“James of the Joyces”), orig. presented to O’Connor and reproduced by permission of Sothebys.

[ top ]

Clive Hart, ed., James Joyce’s Dubliners: Critical Essays (NY: Viking Press 1969), 183pp. CONTENTS: Clive Hart, Preface; John William Corrington, ‘The Sisters’ [13]; Fritz Senn, ‘An Encounter’ [26]; J.S. Atherton, ‘Araby’ [39]; Clive Hart, ‘Eveline’ [48]; Zack Bowen, ‘After the Race’ [53]; A. Walton Litz, ‘Two Gallants’ [62]; Nathan Halper, ‘The Boarding House’ [72]; Robert Boyle, ‘A Little Cloud’ [84]; Robert Scholes, ‘Counterparts’ [93]; Adaline Glasheen, ‘Clay’ [100]; Thomas E. Connolly, ‘A Painful Case’ [107]; M. J. C. Hodgart, ‘Ivy Day in the Committee Room’ [115]; David Hayman, ‘A Mother’ [122]; Richard M. Kain, ‘Grace’ [134]; Bernard Benstock. ‘The Dead’ [153]; Appendix - Supplementary Notes [171]; Contributors [181-83].

Margaret C. Solomon, Eternal Geomater: The Sexual Universe of Finnegans Wake (Southern Illinois UP 1969), xi, 164pp. CONTENTS: Introduction [v]; I. Three Times Is a Charm: The Prankquean [3]; 2. The Game of Colours [21]; 3. The Captain, and the Russian General [3]; 4 The Door [50]; II: The Letter [50]; 5. T [59]; 6. Tree [70]; 7. Tea [77]; 8. The [81]; III. Key Figures [9]; Three, Two, and One [89]; 10. Plain Geometry [103]; 11. The Coach with the Sex Insides [113]; Notes [133]; Index [157].

John Ryan, ed., A Bash in the Tunnel: James Joyce by the Irish (Brighton: Clifton Books 1970), 259pp. Frontis. ‘James Joyce’ by Sean O’Sullivan, RHA [chalk]; [untitled] poem by John Montague; CONTENTS: Introduction [9; see extract]; Brian Nolan [aka Flann O’Brien], ‘A Bash in the Tunnel’ [15; see extract]; Samuel Beckett, ‘Dante ... Bruno ... Vico ... Joyce’ [21; see extract]; W. B. Stanford, ‘The Mysticism that Pleased Him: A Note on the Primary Source of Joyce’s Ulysses’ [35]; Edna O’Brien, ‘Dear Mr. Joyce’ [43; extract]; Patrick Kavanagh, ‘Who Killed James Joyce?’ [49; see extract]; Joseph Hone, ‘A Recollection of James Joyce’ [53; see extract]; Aidan Higgins, ‘Tired Lines: Or Tales My Mother Told Me’ [55]; Niall Montgomery, ‘Joyeux quicum Ulysse ... swissairis dubellay gadelice’ [61]; Ulick O’Connor, ‘Joyce and Gogarty’ [73]; Stanislaus Joyce, ‘The Bud’ [101]; John Jordan, ‘Joyce Without Tears: A Personal Journey’ [135; see extract]; Eoin O’Mahony, ‘Father Conmee and his Associates’ [147]; Patrick Boyle, ‘Drums and guns, and guns and drums. Hurrah! hurrah!’ [157]; Denis Johnston, ‘A Short View of the Progress of Joyceanity’ [163; see extract]; Andrew Cass [John Garvin], ‘Childe Horrid’s pilgrimace’ [169]; Arthur Power, ‘James Joyce: The Internationalist’ [181]; Bernard Share, ‘Downes’s cakeshop and Williams’s Jam’ [189]; bJ. B. Lyons, ‘Doctors and Hospitals’ [193]; F. Harvey, ‘Stephen Hero and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: The Intervention of Style in a Work of the Creative Imagination’ [203]; Monk Gibbon, ‘The Unraised Hat’ [209; see extract]; Thomas McGreevy, ‘The Catholic Element in Work in Progress’ [213]; John Francis Byrne, ‘Diseases of the Ox’ [221]; Benedict Kiely, ‘The Artist on the Giant’s Grave’ [235]; ‘What the Irish Papers Said: The Obituary Memoirs Appearing in the Irish papers of January 1941’ [243]; Notes on Contributors [251]; Index [255].

Robert Deming, ed., James Joyce: The Critical Heritage [2 vols.] (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1970). Vol. 1, CONTENTS: NOTES ON THE TEXT [xiii]; INTRODUCTION [I]. 1. GEORGE RUSSELL (AE) on James Joyce 1902 [32]; 2. AE on Joyce 1902 [33]; 3. STANISLAUS JOYCE on his brother 1903 [33]; 4. Æ [George Russell] on Joyce 1903 [34]; 5. STANISLAUS on Joyce 1904 [35]; 6. AE on Joyce 1905 [35]. Chamber Music (1907): 7 ARTHUR SYMONS on Joyce 1906 [36]; 8. THOMAS KETTLE, review in Freeman’s Journal, 1907 [37]; 9. SYMONS, review in Nation, 1907 [38]; 10. Notice in Bookman (London) 1907 [40]; 11. Opinions of Chamber Music, 1907 [41]; 12 Review in Egoist 19A 43]; 13. ‘M. A.’ review in New Republic 1919 [43]; 14 MORTON D. ZABEL on Chamber Music, 1930 45]; 15. LOUIS GOLDING on Joyce’s poetry, [Nineteenth Century & After] 1933 [49]; 16. ARTHUR SYMONS on Joyce’s poetry, 1933 [52]; 17. ITALO SVEVO on Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist, 1909 [56]. Dubliners (1914): 18. An Irish view of Dubliners, 1908 [by Joseph Hone] [58]; 19. SYMONS on Dubliners, 1914 59]; 20. Review in Times Literary Supplement, 194 [60]; 21. Review in Athenaeum, 1914 [61]; 22. GERALD GOULD on Dubliners, 1914 [62]; 23. Review in Everyman, 1914 [64]; 24. Review in Academy, 1914 [65]; 25. EZRA POUND on Dubliners, 1914 [66]; 26. Review in Irish Book Lover, 1914 [68]; 27. A French view of Dubliners, 1926 [69]; 28. Review of the French translation, 1926 [71]; 29. Another French view of Dubliners, 1926 [72]; 30. Review of the French translation, 1926 [73]; 31. A later opinion of Dubliners, 1930 [75]; 32. Review of the German translation, 1934 [76]. Opinions (1915-16): 33/ POUND to H. L. Meticken 1915 [78]; 34. POUND to Mencken, 1915 [78]; 35. W. B. YEATS to Edmund Gosse 1915 [79]; 36. W. B. YEATS on Joyce 1915 [79]; 37. GEORGE MOORE on Joyce 1916 [80]. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916): 38. Reader’s Report on A Portrait of the Artist 1916 [81]; 39. POUND on A Portrait, 1917 [82]; 40. Review in Everyman, 1917 [85]; 41. H. G. WELLs, review in Nation, 1917 [86]; 42 A. CLUTTON-BR0CK, review in Times Literary Supplement, 1917 [89]; 43 Review in Literary World, 1917 [91]; 44 Review in Manchester Guardian, 1917 [92]; 45. FRANCIS HACKETT, review in New Republic, 1917 [94]; 46 Notice in Nation (NY), 1917 [97]; 47. Review in Freeman’s Journal, 1917 [98]; 48. J. C. SQUIRE, review in New Statesman, 1917 [99]; 49. Review in Irish Book Lover, 1917 [102]; 50. JOHN QUINN, review in Vanity Fair, 1917 [103]; 51. VAN WYCK BROOKS, review in Seven Arts, 1917 [106]; 52. JOHN MACY, review of A Portrait and Dubliners, 1917 [107]; 53. Review in New Age, 1917 [110]. Comments on A Portrait (1917-22): 54. STANISLAUS on A Portrait, 1904 [112]; 55. POUND to John Quinn, 1917 [113]; 56. An Italian comment on A Portrait, 1917 [114]; 57. JANE HEAP on Joyce, 1917 [117]; 58. MARGARET ANDERSON on Joyce, 1917 [118]; 59. A POUND editorial on Joyce and Wyndham Lewis, 1917 [119]; 60. WYNDHAM LEWIS on A Portrait, 1937 [120]; 61. JOHN F. HARRIS on the unconventional 1918 [121]; 62. HART CRANE on Joyce and ethics, 1918 [123]; 63. VIRGINIA WOOLF on modern Novels, 1919 [125]; 64. FLORENT FELS, review of A Portrait, 1920 [127]; 65. FORD MADOX FORD on Joyce, 1922 [128]. Exiles (1918): 66. GEORGE BERNARD SHAW, the Stage Society and Exiles 130]; 67. G.B.S., the Stage Society and Exiles 132]; 68. POUND on Exiles and the modern drama 1916 [133]; 69. Review [by JWG] in Freeman’s Journal, 1918 [135]; 70. A. CLUTTON-BROCK, review in Times Literary Supplement, 1918 [137]; 71. DESMOND MacCARTHY, review in New Statesman, 1918 [140]; 72. PADRAIC COLUM, review in Nation, 1918 [144]; 73. FRANCIS HACKETT, review in New Republic, 1918 [146]; 74. Little Review symposium on Exiles 1919 [148]; 75. A French comment on Exiles 1919 [154]; 76. FRANCIS FERGUSSON on Exiles and Ibsen, 1932 [155]; 77. BERNARD BANDLER on Exiles, 1933 [159]. Some Views from 1918 to 1921: 78. P. BEAUMONT WADSWORTH on Joyce, 1917 [161]; 79. POUND to Mencken 1915 [162]; 80 POUND to John Quinn, 1918 [163]; 81. PADRAIC COLUM on Joyce and Dublin, 1918 [163]; 82. POUND on the early works 1918, 167]; 83. SILVIO BENCO on Joyce and Trieste 1918 [170]; 84 YEATS to John Quinn, 1918 [172]; 85. SCOFIELD THAYER on Joyce’s works, 1918 [173]; 86. POUND to John Quinn, 1920 [176]; 87. EVELYN SCOTT on Joyce and modernity 1920 [177]; 88. J. C. SQUIRE on Joyce, 1921 [181]; 89. ARTHUR POWER on Joyce, 1921 [182]; 90. Joyce and Jazz Prose, 1921 [183]. Ulysses (1922): 91. VALERY LARBAUD, reaction to Ulysses, 1921 [184]; 92. Ulysses and censorship, 1921 [185]; 93. RICHARD ALDINGTON on the influence of Joyce, 1921 [186]; 94 SHAW’s reaction to the Ulysses prospectus, 1921 [189]. Ulysses: Reviews: 95. Review in Daily Express, 1922 [191]; 96. Review in Sporting Times (The Pink ‘Un), 1922 [192]; 97. Review in Evening News, 1922 [194]; 98. JOHN M. MURRY, review in Nation & Athenaaeum, 1922 [195]; 99 HOLBROOK JACKSON, review in To-Day, 1922 [198]; 100. Review in Dublin Review, 1922 [200]; 101. Reaction to a review, 1922 [204]; 102. SHANE LESLIE, review in Quarterly Review, 1922 [206]; 103. GEORGE REHM, review in Chicago Tribune, 1922 [212]; 104. SISLEY HUDDLESTON, review in Observer, 1922 [213]; IO5. GEORGE SLOCOMBE, review in Daily Herald, 1922 [217]; 106. ARNOLD BENNETT, review in Outlook, 1922 [219]; 107. JOSEPH COLLINS, review in New York Times, 1922 [222]; 108. EDMUND WILSON, review in New Republic, 1922 [227]; 109. MARY COLUM, review in Freeman, 1922 [231]; 110 GILBERT SELDES, review in Nation, 1922 [235]. Ulysses: Reviews of the American Edition (1934): 111. HORACE GREGORY, review in New York Herald Tribune, 1934 [240]; 112. GILBERT SELDES, review in New York Evening Journal, 1934 [241]; 113. Review in Carnegie Magazine, 1934 [242]; 114. ROBERT CANTWELL, review in New Outlook, 1934 [245]; 115. EDWIN BAIRD, review in Real America, 1934 [245]; 116. Review of the English edition in New Statesman, 1936 [247]; 117. Review of the English edition in Times Literary Supplement, 1937 [250]. Contemporary Critical Opinions: 118. VALÉRY LARBAUD on Joyce, 1922 [252]; 119 POUND on Ulysses and Flaubert, 1922 [263]; 120. T. S. ELIOT on Ulysses and myth, 1923 [268]; 121. JOHN EGLINTON on Joyce’s method, 1922 [271]; 122. C.ECIL MAITLAND on the Catholic tradition, 1922 [272]; 123. ALFRED NOYES on literary Bolshevism, 1922 [274]; 124. FORD MADOX FORD on Ulysses and indecency, 1922 [276]; 125. PAUL CLAUDEL on Ulysses, 1922 [279]; 126. ROBERT McALMON on Joyce and Ulysses 1920-22 [280]; 127. OLIVER ST. JOHN GOGARTY comment on Ulysses, 1922 [282]; 128. GERTRUDE STEIN on Joyce [283]; 129. YEATS to OLIVIA SHAKESPEAR, 1922 [284]; 130. HART CRANE on Ulysses, 1922 [284]; 131. FORD MADOX FORD on Ulysses, 1922 [285]; 132. 1923: GEORGE SLOCOMBE on Joyce, 1923 [286]; 133. ALEISTER CROWLEY on the novel of the mind, 1923 [287]; 134. An interview with VALÉRY LARBAUD, 1923 [289]; 135. YEATs and the Dublin Philosophical Society, 1923 [290]. 1923 Ulysses: 136. An Irish comment on Ulysses, 1923 [292]; 137. An Irish Opinion of Joyce, 1923 [297]; 138. STEPH.BN GWYNN on modern Irish literature, 1923 [299]; 139. ERNEST BOYD on Ireland’s literary renaissance, 1923 [301]. 1924 Ulysses: 140. F. M. FORD on the cadence of Joyce’s prose, 1924 [306]; 141. Comment on YEAT’s discovery of Joyce,1924 [307]; 142. ALEC WAUGH on Joyce’s style, 1924 [308]; 143. FRANKLIN ADAMS, comment on Ulysses, 1924 [309]; 144. JULIEN GREEN comments on Ulysses, 1924 [309]; 145 EDMUND GOS SE to Louis Gillet, 1924 [313]; 146. LOUIS CAZAMIAN on Joyce and Ulysses, 1924 [314]. 1925: 147 ERNEST BOYD on Joyce, 1925 320]; 148. EDMUND WILSON on Joyce as a poet, 1925 [322]; 1925 Ulysses: 149. R. H. PENDER on Ulysses, 1925 [325]; 150. EDWIN MUIR on the meaning of Ulysses, 1925 [327]; 151. A French critique of Louis Gillet, 1925 [335]; 152. German comment on Ulysses by BERNHARD FEHR, 1925 [336]. 1926: 153. RENÉ LALOU on Joyce’s works, 1926 [344]; 154. POUND on’Work in Progress’, 1926 [346]. Pomes Penyeach (1927): 155. GEORGE SLOCOMBE, review in Daily Herald, 1927 [347]; 156. A review in Irish Statesman, 1927 [348]; 157. Review in Nation, 1927 [349]; 158. MARCEL BRION, review in Les Nouvelles littéraires, 1927 [350]; 159. EDMUND WILSON, review in New Republic, 1927 [351]; 160 PADRAIC COLUM, review in New York World, 1928 [352]; 161. ROBERT HILLYER, comment in New Adelphi, 1928 [353]. 1927: 162. YEATS on Joyce in the Irish Senate, 1927 [354]. 1927 Ulysses: 163. ITALO SVEVO, lecture on Joyce at Milan, 1927 [355]; 164. ARMIN KESSER on the German Ulysses, 1927 [357]; 165. WYNDHAM LEWIS on time in Joyce, 1927 [359]; 166. HERBERT GORMAN on Joyce’s form, 1927 [366]; 167. YVAN GOLL on Ulysses, 1927 [368]; 168. Another GOLL comment on Ulysses, 1927 [370]. 1927 ‘Work in Progress’: 169. MARY COLUM on the enigma of ‘Work in Progress’, 1927 [373]; 170. HENRY SEIDEL CANBY, reaction to ‘Work in Progress’, 1927 [374]; 171. ‘AFFABLE HAWK’ [Desmond MacCarthy] dissatisfaction with ‘Work in Progress’, 1927 [375]; 172 WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS on Joyce’s style, 1927 [377]; 173 EUGENE JOLAS et al., answer Wyndham Lewis, 1927 [379]; 174. GERTRUDE STEIN and T. S. ELIOT on Joyce, 1927 [380]; 175. EUGENE JOLAS, memoir of Joyce, 1927 [381]. End Vol. 1.

[ Note: a search-only copy of volume has been digitised by Google and is available in Internet - online. ]

Robert Deming, ed., James Joyce: The Critical Heritage [2 vols.] (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1970). Vol. 2, CONTENTS: Anna Livia Plurabelle [ALP] (1928): 176. Early reaction from STANISLAUS JOYCE, 1924 [387]; 177. PADRAIC COLUM, Preface for Anna Livia Plurabelle, 1928 [388]; 178. SEAN O’FAOLAIN on the language of ALP, 1928 [391]; 179. GERALD GOULD, comment in Observer, 1928 [392]; 180. Review in Times Literary Supplement, 1928 [394]; 181. review in Irish Statesman, 1928 [395]; 182. O’FAOLAIN, reply to review in Irish Statesman, 1929 [396]; 183. EUGÈNE JOLAS, reply to Sean O’Faolain, 1929 [398]; 184. O’FAOLAIN, reply to EUGÈNE Jolas, 1929 [399]; 185. CYRIL CONNOLLY, review in Life and Letters, 1929 [401]; 186. ARNOLD BENNETT, comment in London Evening Standard, 1929 [404]; 187 LEON EDEL on Work in Progress, 1930 [405]; 188. G. W. STONIER, review of ALP and Haveth Childers Everywhere, 1930 [408]; 189. Times Literary Supplement review of ALP and HCE, 1930 [411]; 190. O’FAOLAIN re-reading of ALP, 1930 [413]; 191 PHILIPPE SOUPAULT and the French translation of ALP, 1931 [414]; 192. French comment on ‘Work in Progress’, 1931 [415]; 193 MAX EASTMAN, interview with Joyce about ALP, 1931 [416]. 1928: 194. F. SCOTT FITZGERALD and Joyce, 1928 [420]; 195. ELLEN GLASGOW on the novel, 1928 [421]; 196. DENIS MARION on Joyce, 1928 [422]. 1928 Ulysses: 197. SISLEY HUDDLESTON on Joyce and Sylvia Beach, 1928 [423]; 198. A French comment on Joyce the romancier, 1928 [427]; 199. REBECCA WEST on Joyce, 1928 [430]; 200 CAROLA GIEDION-WELCKER on Ulysses, 1928 [437]; 201. STEFAN ZWEIG on Ulysses, 1928 [444]; 202. GERHARDT HAUPTMANN on Ulysses, 1928 [447]; 203. ERNST R. CURTIUS on Joyce’s works, 1928 [447]; 204. WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS On Ulysses, 1928 [451]. 1928 Work in Progress: 205. JACK LINDSAY on the modern consciousness, 1928 [453]; 206. ROBERT MCALMON on Joyce, transition and ALP, 1928 [454]; 207. H. G. WELLS deserts the standard, 1928 [457]. 1929: 208 JOHN EGLINTON on Joyce’s emancipation, 1929 [459]. 1929 Ulysses: 209. JACK KAHANE, comment on Ulysses, 1929 [460]; 210. WYNDHAM LEWIS to A. Symons on Ulysses, 1929 [461]; 211. ADRIENNE MONNIER on Ulysses and French public, 1929 [462]; 212. ERNST R. CURTIUS on Ulysses, 1929 [466]; 213. JEAN CASSOU, review of French Ulysses, 1929 [470]; 214. ARNOLD BENNETT on the influence of Ulysses, 1929 [473]; 215. MARCEL BRION, review of Ulysses, 1929 [474]; 216 MARC CHADOURNE, comment on Ulysses, 1929 [476]; 217. PAUL SOUDAY, opinion of Ulysses, 1929 [477]; 218. MARCEL THIEBAUT, review of Ulysses, 1929 [478]; 219. BRIAN PENTON, comment on the form of the novel, 1929 [480]; 220. S.ER DAMON on Ulysses and Dublin, 1929 [482]; 221. EDMOND JALOUX on the English novel, 1929 [486]. 1929 Work in Progress: 222. PADRAIC COLUM assisting with ‘Work in Progress’, 1929 [487]; 223. MAX EASTMAN on intelligibility, 1929 [489]; 224. HARRY CROSBY answers Max Eastman, 1929 [490]; 225. C. K. OGDEN on linguistic experiment, 1929 [492]; 226. ARNOLD BENNETT on the oddest novel, 1929 [493]; 227. C. GIEDION-WELCKER on Joyce’s experiment, 1929 [495]; 228 MICHAEL STUART on ‘Work in Progress’, 1929 [500]. Tales Told of Shem & Shaun [TTSS] (August, 1929): 229. Editorial in New York Times, 1929 [503]; 230. MICHAEL STUART on the sublime, 1929 [504]; HAMISH MILES, review in Criterion, 1930 [506]; 232. Review in Saturday Review, 1932 [507]; 233. D. G. BRIDSON, review in New English Weekly, 1933 [508]; 234. E. OLDMEADOW, review in Tablet, 1933 [511]; 235. Unsigned comment on T. S. Eliot and Joyce, 1933 [513]. 1930: 236. FRANK O’CONNOR on Joyce, 1930 [515]; 237. HERBERT READ on classic or romantic, 1930 [518]; 238. HERBERT READ on Joyce’s influence, 1930 [520]; 239. PHILIPPE SOUPAULT on Joyce, 1930, 1943, 1959; 1963 [523]. 1930 Ulysses: 240. AUSTIN CLARKE on Joyce, 1930 [527]; 241 G. K. CHESTERTON on Joyce, 1930 [529]. 1930 Work in Progress: 242. PAUL L. LÉON and Joyce, 1930 [531]; 243. REBECCA WEST on ‘Work in Progress’, 1930 [534]; 244. STUART GILBERT on Joyce’s growth, 1930 [537]. Haveth Childers Everywhere [HCE] (June, 1930): 245. PADRAIC COLUM, review in New Republic, 1930 [542]; 246. MICHAEL PETCH, opinion in Everyman, 1931 [545]. 1931 Ulysses: 247 SISLEY HUDDLESTON on Joyce and Ulysses, 1931 [548]; 248 WYNDHAM LEWIS on Joyce, 1931 [552]; 249. HENRI FLUCHÈRE on Ulysses, 1931 [553]; 250. A FELLOW DUBLINER on Joyce, S. Gilbert and Gogarty, 1931 [556]; 251. HAROLD NICOLSON on the significance of Joyce, 1931 [560]. 1931 ‘Work in Progress’: 252. STUART GILBERT explicates ‘Work in Progress’, 1931 [564]; 253. GEORGE MOORE to Louis Gillet, 1931 [565]; 254. MICHAEL STUART on Joyce’s word creatures, 1931 [567]. 1932: 255 EUGÈNE JOLAS, homage to Joyce, 1932 [570]; 256. ELLIOT PAUL, comment on Joyce, 1932 [572]; 257. DESMOND MacCARTHY on the postwar novel, 1932 [574]; 258. JOHN EGLINTON on the early Joyce, 1932 [577]. 1932 Ulysses: 259. HENRY DANIEL-ROPS on the interior monologue, 1932 [580]; 260. THOMAS WOLFE, comment on Ulysses, 1932 [582]; 261. CARL JUNG, letter to Joyce, 1932 [583]; 262. CARL JUNG on Ulysses, 1932 [584]; 263. L. A. G. STRONG on Joyce, 1932 [586]. 1933: 264. A. LYNER on music and Joyce, 1933 [587]; 265. MIRSKY on bourgeois decadence, 1933 [589]. 1933 Ulysses: 266. EMERIC FISCHER on the interior monologue, 1933 [593]; 267. POUND on Ulysses and Wyndham Lewis, 1933 [596]; 268. ROBERT CANTWELL on Joyce’s influence, 1933 [597]; 269. G. K. CHESTERTON on eccentricity, 1933 [601]. 1933 ‘Work in Progress’: 270. EUGÈNE JOLAS explication, 1933 [603]; 271. RONALD SYMOND on ‘The Mookse and the Gripes’, 1934 [605]. 1934 Mime of Mick, Nick and the Maggies [Mime]: 272. G. W. STONIER, review in New Statesman, 1934 [606]. 1934: 273. MALCOLM COWLEY on religion of art, 1934 [611]; 274. JOHN H. ROBERTS on religion to art, 1934 [612]; 275. A Communist on Joyce, 1934 [616]; 276. FRANK BUDGEN on Joyce, 1934 [618]. 1934 Ulysses: 277. ALEC BROWN on Ulysses and the novel, 1934 [620]; 278 ERNEST BOYD on Joyce’s influence, 1934 [622]; 279. KARL RADEK on Joyce’s realism, 1934 [624]; 280. FRANK SWINNERTON on Joyce and Freud, 1934 [626]. 1934 ‘Work in Progress’: 281. RICHARD THOM on the dream in progress, 1934 [630]; 282. EDITH SITWELL on prose innovations, 1934 [632]. 1935: 283. DOROTHY RICHARDSON on Joyce, 1935 [633]; 284. L. A. G. STRONG on the novel, 1935 [634]; 285. L. A. G. STRONG on Joyce and new fiction, 1935 [636]. 1936: 286. James Joyce and Gertude Stein, 1936 [640]; 287. THOMAS WOLFE on Ulysses, 1936 [642]; 288. JAMES T. FARRELL, reply to Mirsky and Radek, 1936 [643]. Collected Poems (1936): 289. Review in New York Herald Tribune, 1936 [646]; 290. HORACE REYNOLDS, comment in New York Times, 1937 [648]; 291 IRENE HENDRY on Joyce’s poetry, 1938 [650]. 1937: 292. MARY COLUM on Joyce, 1937 [652]. 1938: 293. Æ [George Russell] on Joyce and Ulysses, 1938 653]; 294. A Marxian view of Ulysses, 1938 [654]; 295. EUGÈNE JOLAS, homage and commentary, 1938 [658]. Finnegans Wake (1939): 296 L. A. G. STRONG, review in John O’London’s Weekly, 1939 [661]; 297. PAUL ROSENFELD, review in Saturday Review of Literature, 1939 [663]; 298. LOUISE BOGAN, review in Nation, 1939 [665]; 299. Review in Times Literary Supplement, 1939 [667]; 300. PADRAIC COLUM, review in New York Times, 1939 [669]; 301. OLIVER GOGARTY, review in Observer, 1939 [673]; 302. EDWIN Muir, review in Listener, 1939 [675]; 303. B. IFOR EVANS, review in Manchester Guardian, 1939 [678]; 304. G. W. STONIER, review in New Statesman, 1939 [679]; 305. GEORGES PELORSON, review in Aux Écoutes, 1939 [680]; 306 MALCOLM MUGGERIDGE, review in Time and Tide, 1939 [683]; 307 ALFRED KAZIN, review in New York Herald Tribune, 1939 [685]; 308. MORLEY CALLAGHAN, review in Saturday Night, 1939 [688]; 309. RICHARD ALDINGTON, review in Atlantic Monthly, 1939 [690]; 310. Review in Irish Times, 1939 [691]; 311. HARRY LEVIN, review in New Directions, 1939 [693]; 312.WILLIAM TROY, review in Partisan Review, 1939 [704]; 313. A. GLENDINNING, review in Nineteenth Century, 1939 [708]; 314. Review in Dublin Magazine, 1939 [710]; 315. SALVATORE ROSATI, review in Nuova Antologia, 1939 [713]. Contemporary Critical Comment: 316. SEÁN O’CASEY, letter to Joyce, 1939 [716]; 317. DOROTHY RICHARDSON, Opinion, 1939 [717]; 318. LEON EDEL on Finnegans Wake, 1939 [719]; 319. MARY COLUM on Finnegans Wake, 1939 [721]; 320. MARGARET SCHLAUCH on Joyce’s language, 1939 [722]; 321. LOUIS GILLET on Finnegans Wake, 1940 [724]; 322. WALTER RYBERT on how to read Finnegans Wake, 1940 [731]; 323 JOHN PEALE BISHOP on Finnegans Wake, 1940 [736]. 1941: 324. MAX RYCHNER on Ulysses, 1941 [740]; 325. VAN WYCK BROOKS on Joyce, 1941 [743]. Critical Obituaries: 326. THORNTON WILDER, in Poetry, 1941 [745]; 327. CYRIL CONNOLLY, in New Statesman, 1941 [746]; 328. Notice in New Republic, 1941 [747]; 329. STEPHEN SPENDER, in Listener, 1941 [748]; 330. OLIVER GOGARTY, in Saturday Review of Literature, 1941 [750]; 331. Notice in Times Literary Supplement, 1941 [752]; 332. J. DONALD ADAMS, in New York Times, 1941 [754]; 333. PADRAIC COLUM, reply to Oliver Gogarty, 1941 [755]; 334 FRANK BUDGEN, in Horizon, 1941 [756]; 335. T. S. ELIOT, in Horizon, 1941 [757]. After 1941: 336. PAUL LÉON remembers, 1942 [760]; 337. JAMES STEPHENs remembers, 1946 [762]; 338 OLIVER GOGARTY comments, 1950 [763]; 339. OLIVER GOGARTY corrects memories, 1950 [764]; 340. MARY COLUM corrects Gogarty, 1950 [765]; 341. STANISLAUS JOYCE corrects Gogarty, 1953 [767]; 342. MALCOLM COWLEY recalls Joyce and Sylvia Beach, 1963 [769]; 343. JANET FLANNER recalls Joyce and Sylvia Beach, 1963 [770]; 144. An Irish last word, 1964 [771]. APPENDIX A: Early Editions of the Writings of James Joyce [772]. APPENDIX B: Selected Bibliography [774]. APPENDIX C: Book-length studies published during Joyce’s lifetime and critical studies which have been collected or reprinted and are readily accessible [775]. APPENDIX D: Reviews and early critical studies excluded from this volume [778]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS [785]; INDEX [795]. End Vol. 2.

[ Note that this volume has been digitised by Google and is available in Internet - online. ]

[ top ]

Malcolm Brown, The Politics of Irish Literature: From Thomas Davis to W. B. Yeats (Seattle: Washington UP; London: Allen & Unwin 1972). INDEX: Joyce, James: pp.ix, 3, 10, 12, 14, 16, 42, 54, 55 91n, 113, 120, 123, 176, 183, 199, 206, 222, 240, 242, 250, 266n, 276n, 278-79, 318, 324, 331n, 351n, 358, 360, 363, 369, 371; strength and limitations of view of Ireland: p.17; note responsive to comedy of resurgence: p.42; phobia on informers: p.113; meaning of Irish history as “heroticism”: p.279; scorns Lady Gregory: p.318; scorns Union of Heart: p.324; on Gaelic League: p.355; contradictory position on Split: pp.385-86; humanist Parnellism: pp.387-89; “The Dead”: pp.159, 319; Dubliners: pp.11, 57, 350; “Et Tu, Healy”: p.385; “Gas from a Burner”: p.341; Finnegans Wake: pp.7, 115, 263, 313, 330; Italian lecture on Parnell p.387; A Portrait of the Artist: pp.158, 186, 265, 278-79, 305, 314, 324, 385-87, 389; Stephen Hero: p.304; Ulysses: pp.6, 13, 22, 30, 127, 144-45, 173, 194-96, 213, 256, 280-81, 316n, 348n, 359, 382; “Aeolus”: p.97; “Circe”: p.166-67, 283, 386; “Cyclops”: pp.166-67, 207, 281; “Eumaeus”: pp.153, 275, 281, 342, 387; “Proteus”: pp.224-26; “Sirens”: pp.11, 282; “Wandering Rocks”: p.252; Joyce, John Stanislaus: p.28; reaction to Split: pp.339-40; 385-86.

Morris Beja, ed., James Joyce - “Dubliners” and “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man”: A Casebook (London: Macmillan 1973), 256pp. CONTENTS: [Part 1: Background and Early Responses]; Morris Beja, ‘Introduction [15]; ‘Letters from Joyce (1904-1906) [35]; Selections from Joyce’s Manuscripts: ‘A Portrait of the Artist (1904)’ [41]; ‘Stephen on Epiphany’ [48]; ‘Twelve “Epiphanies”’ [52]; ‘The Pola Notebook (1904)’ [57]; The Early Response to Dubliners: Reviews ‘Times Literary Supplement (1904)’ [60]; ‘Gerald Gould (1914)’ [61]; The Joyce Family: ‘Stanislaus Joyce’s Diary (1903 extracts)’ [64]; James Joyce, ‘There once was a lounger named Stephen (1917)’ [72]; John Stanislaus Joyce, ‘Letter to His Son (1931)’ [73]; The Early Response to A Portrait of the Artist: Comments and Reviews: ‘Edward Garnett (1916?)’ [74]; ‘The Egoist (June 1917)’ [77]; ‘Literary World (March 1917)’ [78]; ‘Irish Book Lover (April-May 1917)’ [79]; [Part 2: Critical Studies]; Harry Levin, ‘The Artist (1941)’ [83]; Brewster Ghiselin, ‘The Unity of Dubliners (1956)’ [100]; Frank O’Connor, ‘Joyce and Dissociated Metaphor (1956)’ [117]; Hugh Kenner, ‘The Portrait in Perspective (1955)’ [124]; Maurice Beebe, ‘Joyce and Aquina: The Theory of Aesthetics (1957)’ [151]; Richard Ellmann, ‘The Backgrounds of “The Dead” (1959)’ [172]; Wayne C. Booth, ‘The Problem of Distance in A Portrait of the Artist (1961)’ [188]; J. I. M. Stewart, ‘Dubliners (1963)’ [202]; Morris Beja, ‘The Wooden Sword: Threatener and Threatened in the World of James Joyce (1964)’ [208]; Anthony Burgess, ‘A Paralysed City (1965)’ [224]; John Gross, ‘The Voyage Out (1970)’ [241]; Select Bibliography [245]; Contributors [249]; Index [251-56].

Clive Hart & David Hayman, eds., James Joyce’s Ulysses: Critical Essays (California UP 1974), 433pp. CONTENTS: Bernard Benstock, ‘Telemachus’; E. L. Epstein, ‘Nestor’; J. Mitchell Morse, ‘Proteus’; Adaline Glasheen, ‘Calypso’; Philip F. Herring, ‘Lotuseaters’; R. M. Adams, ‘Hades’; M. J. C. Hodgart, ‘Aeolus’; Melvin J. Friedman, ‘Lestrygonians’; Robert Kellogg, ‘Scylla and Charybdis’; Clive Hart, ‘Wandering rocks’; Jackson I. Cope, ‘Sirens’; David Hayman, ‘Cyclops’; Fritz Senn, ‘Nausicaa’; J. S. Atherton, ‘The Oxen of the Sun’; Hugh Kenner, ‘Circe’; Gerald L. Bruns, ‘Eumaeus’; A. Walton Litz, ‘Ithaca’; Fr. Robert Boyle, ‘Penelope’.

Michael H. Begnal & Fritz Senn, eds., A Conceptual Guide to Finnegans Wake (Pennsylvania State UP 1974) , 236pp. CONTENTS: Notes on the contributors [vii]; 1. J. Mitchell Morse, ‘Where Terms Begin / I.i. [1]; 2. Roland McHugh, ‘Recipis for the price of a Coffin’ / I.ii-iv [18]; 3. Bernard Benstock, ‘Concerning Lost Historeve’ / I.v [33]; 4. E. L. Epstein, ‘The Turning Point’/ I.vi. [56]; Robert Boyle, ‘Portrait of the Artist as a Balzacian Wilde Ass’ / I.vii-viii [71]; 6. Mathew Hodgart, ‘Music and Mine’ / II.i [83]; 7. Ronald E. Buckalew, ‘Night Lessons on Language / II.ii [93]; 8. Edward A. Kopper, ‘”but where he is eaten”: Earwicker’s Tavern Feast’ / II.iii [116]; 9. Michael H. Begnal, ‘Love that Dares to Speak its Name’ / II.iv [139]; 10. James S. Atherton, ‘Shaun A / III.i. [149]; 11. Hugh B. Staples, ‘Growing Up Absurd in Dublin’ / III.ii-iii [173]; 12. Margaret Solomon, ‘The Porters: A Square Performance of Three Tiers in the Round’ / III.iv; 13. Grace Elkley, ‘Looking Forward to a Brightening Day’ / IV.i [221].

Thomas F. Staley & Bernard Benstock, Approaches to Joyce’s Portrait: 10 Essays (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh 1976), 241pp. CONTENTS: Thomas F. Staley, ‘Strings in the Labyrinth: Sixty Years with Joyce’s Portrait’; Hans Walter Gabler, ‘The Seven Lost Years of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man’; Breon Mitchell, ‘A Portrait and the Bildungsroman tradition’; Margaret Church, ‘A Portrait and Giambattista Vico: A Source Study’; Richard M. Kain, ‘Epiphanies of Dublin’; James Naremore, ‘Consciousness and Society in A Portrait of the Artist’; Chester G. Anderson, ‘Baby Tuckoo: Joyce’s “Features of infancy”’; Hugh Kenner, ‘The Cubist Portrait’; Bernard Benstock, ‘A Light from Some Other World: Symbolic Structure in A Portrait of the Artist’; Darcy O’Brien, ‘In Ireland after A Portrait’.

[ top ]

K. McCrory & J. Unterecker, eds., Yeats, Joyce and Beckett: New Light on Three Modern Irish Writers (Lewisburg: Bucknell UP 1976), 184pp. CONTENTS: Preface [9]; Notes on Contributors [15-16]; Part 1. W. B. Yeats; John Unterecker, ‘The Yeats Landscape’ [photographs]; [21]; Adrienne Gardner, ‘Deirdre: Yeats’s Other Greek Tragedy’ [35]; John Unterecker, ‘Interview with Anne Yeats’ [39]; Austin Clarke, ‘Glimpses of W. B. Yeats’ [46]; Kathleen McGrory, ‘Scholarship Frowned into Littleness?’ [52]; Bibl. of Works Mentioned [67]; Part 2. James Joyce; William York Tindall, ‘The Joyce Landscape’ [photographs]; [73]; Raymond J. Porter, ‘The Cracked Lookingglass’ [87]; Margaret C. Solomon, ‘Striking the Lost Chord: The Motif of “Waiting” in the Sirens Episode of Ulysses’ [92]; Nathan Halper, ‘The Aesthetics of Joyce: James Joyce and His Fingernails’ [105]; Kathleen McGrory, ‘Interview with Carola Giedion-Welcker, June 15, 1973’ [110]; Bernard Benstock, ‘James Joyce Industry: A Reassessment’ [118-32]; Part 3. Samuel Beckett; Kathleen McGrory, ‘The Beckett Landscape’ [photographs]; [135]; Vivian Mercier, ‘Ireland/The World’ [147]; Sighle Kennedy, ‘Spirals of Need: Irish Prototypes in Samuel Beckett’s Fiction’ [153]; Rubin Rabinovitz, ‘The Deterioration of Outside Reality in Samuel Beckett’s Fiction’ [167]; Kathleen McGrory and John Unterecker, ‘Interview with Jack MacGowran’ [172]; John Eichrodt and Kathleen McGrory, ‘Chronological Bibliography of Works by William York Tindall’ [183-84].

Michael Groden, general ed., Hans Walter Gabler, David Hayman, A. Walton Litz & Danis Rose, assoc. eds., The James Joyce Archive 63 vols. (NY: Garland Publishing Co. 1977-1979). CONTENTS: [Vol. 1]; Chamber Music, Pomes Penyeach, & occasional verse. [Vols. 2-3]; Notes, Criticism, Translations, & Miscellaneous Works. [Vols. 4-6]; Dubliners. [Vols. 7-10]; A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. [Vol. 11]; Exiles. [Vols. 12-27]; Ulysses. [Vols. 28-43]. Finnegans wake Buffalo notebooks. [Vols.44-63]. Finnegans Wake drafts, typescripts, & proofs. [“An attempt to publish in facsimile the entire ‘workshop’ - all extant and available notes, drafts, manuscripts, typescripts and proofs].

Willard Potts, ed., Portraits of the Artist in Exile: Recollections of James Joyce by Europeans (Washington UP 1979), 304pp. CONTENTS: Alessandro Francini Bruni, ‘Joyce Stripped Naked in the Piazza: Recollections of Joyce’; Silvio Benco, ‘James Joyce in Trieste’; August Suter, ‘Some Reminiscences of James Joyce’; Georges Borach, ‘Conversations with James Joyce’; Nino Frank, ‘The Shadow that had Lost its Man’; Philippe Soupalt, ‘James Joyce’; Adolf Hoffmeister, ‘James Joyce: Portrait of Joyce’; Ole Vinding, ‘James Joyce in Copenhagen’; Jan Parandowski, ‘Meeting with Joyce’; Louis Gillet, ‘Farewell to Joyce: The Living Joyce’; Jacques Mercanton, ‘The Hours of James Joyce’; Carola Giedion-Welcker, ‘Meetings with Joyce’; Paul Ruggiero, ‘James Joyce’s last days in Zurich’; Paul Léon, ‘In memory of Joyce’.

Colin MacCabe, James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word [1st Edn.] (London; Macmillan 1978), x, 186pp. CONTENTS: Table of Cases; Preface; Introduction: Law and Language. PART 1 - LINGUISTICS AND LEGAL THEORY. The Science of Language; The Language of Legal Faith; The Role of Linguistics in Legal Analysis. PART 2 - LEGAL DISCOURSE: Rhetoric as Jurisprudence: An Introduction to the Politics of Legal Language; Law as Social Discourse I: A Topology of Discourse; Law as Social Discourse II: Legal Discourse; Conclusion: Legal Theory and Legal Practice. Notes and References; Bibliography; Index. [See 2nd rev. edn. - infra.]

Colin MacCabe, James Joyce and the Revolution of the Word [2nd Edn., enl.] (London: Palgrave 2003), xxxv, 250pp. CONTENTS: Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; New Introduction; Theoretical Preliminaries; The End of a Meta-Language: From George Eliot to Dubliners; The End of the Story: Stephen Hero and A Portrait; A Radical Separation of the Elements: The Distanciation of the Reader in Ulysses; City of Words; Streets of Dreams: The Voyage of Ulysses; A Political Reading of Finnegans Wake; Joyce’s; Joyce and Chomsky - The Voice of Esau; Joyce and Benjamin; Realism: Balzac and Barthes. Bibliography; Index. [See 1st edn. - supra.]

George J. Watson, Irish Identity and the Literary Revival: Synge, Yeats, Joyce, and O’ Casey (London: Croom Helm 1979). INDEX [references to Joyce]: Joyce, James: pp.2-7, 13-14, 21, 26, 28-29, 32-33, 41, 50 [n.22], 60, 63, 85, 90, 92, 100, 152-244 passim, 246, 255, 283; “The Day of the Rabblement”: pp.157, 160, 181, 229; “Drama and Life”: pp.159, 161, 165, 179, 196; Dubliners: pp.14, 29, 151, 167-79 passim, 180, 197, 206-07, 232, 242; “After the Race”: pp.175, 178; “Araby”: pp.168, 171, 174-75, 178; “The Boarding House”: pp.169, 174, 178; “Clay”: pp.174, 178; “Counterparts”: pp.177-78; “The Dead”; pp.169-70, 175, 178, 196; “An Encounter”: pp.168-69, 174-75, 178; “Eveline”: pp.168-69, 171-75, 178; “Grace”: p.178; “Ivy Day in the Committee Room”: p.178; “A Little Cloud”: pp.169, 174-78; “A Mother”: pp.157, 178; “A Painful Case”: pp.178, 196; “Two Gallants”: pp.169-71, 173-74; “The Sisters”: pp.167 [n.30], 168, 174, 178; “Fenianism. The Last Fenian”: p.153; Finnegans Wake: p.235; “Gas from a Burner”: pp.155-56; “The Holy Office”: pp.60, 151, 160, 181; “The Home Rule Comet”: p.154; “Ibsen’s New Drama”; pp.164, 166; “Ireland, Island of Saints and Sages”: pp.152-56; 158; “A Portrait of the Artist” (1904): p.229; A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: pp.26, 152-53, 156-57, 179-98 passim, 200-03, 209, 229; “The Soul of Ireland”: p.158 [n.15]; Stephen Hero: pp.155-60, 164-66, 175 [n.43], 177-78, 191, 196; Ulysses: pp.1, 5, 7, 32-33, 92, 100, 155-58, 169-70, 178, 182, 191 [n.55], 193-94, 197-244 passim; “Aeolus”: pp.191, 197, 205, 209, 222, 230, 236; “Calypso”: p.236; “Circe”: pp.199-200, 207, 210-11, 213, 215, 222-23, 230, 236-38, 241-42; “Cyclops”: pp.212-13, 230, 237-38; “Eumaeus”: pp.218, 241; “Hades”: pp.214, 224; “Ithaca”: pp.209, 223-24, 226[n.94], 230, 234 [n.115], 238, 241; “Lestrygonians”: p.236; “Lotus-Eaters”: p.219; “Nausicaa”: p.238; “Nestor”: pp.203-04; “Oxen of the Sun”: pp.212, 219-20, 230, 238; “Penelope”: p.213; “Proteus”: pp.201, 203-04; “Scylla and Charybdis”: pp.202-05, 208, 232; “Sirens”: pp.212, 217, 230, 238. Joyce, Stanislaus: pp.221, 226, 229, 230 [n.106], 231-32.